Monday, October 24, 2011

Special Ethical Questions

Ask/address an ethical question in your field of interest.

The ethical question I will be address is homosexual's in the military.  More specifically I will be talking about "Don't Ask Don't Tell", and the Don't Ask Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010. 

Develop/address arguments for each side of the issue, then defend your position on the issue.

        The Don't Ask Don't Tell law was in forced from December 1993 to September 2011.  Prior to the Don't Ask Don't Tell law in 1993 homosexuality was completely unacceptable.  Don't Ask Don't Tell was brought on by President Clinton, and basically was meant to end questioning soldiers of their sexuality.  Homosexuality was still unlawful under this law, but a homosexual could remain in the U.S. military as long as they kept it completely private.  The Don't Ask Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2011 ended Don't Ask Don't Tell, and now allows homosexuals to openly serve in the U.S. military. 
         I have served during the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy, and for a short time I have served after the repeal act.  I have know of homosexuals in the military while I have served and never thought less of them as a soldier.  We all wear the same uniform, and are fighting for the same reasons.  If someone is willing to sign on the dotted line and put their life on the line for the United States they should have the right to be proud of who they and not hide it.  There have been many great soldiers that have been discharged from the United States military, because of the military's stance on homosexuality.  With the repeal of the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy we will not have to lose another, and I believe it will strength the U.S. military.
         Although, I did not agree with the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy I can see why it was in affect for so many years.  The U.S. military has been based on tradition for hundreds of years, and changes do not come quickly.  The U.S. military believed that having openly gay or lesbian soldier's would weaken unit cohesion, discipline, and did not follow the morale standards of the military.  Many of these morale standards come form the Christian religion, which is obviously against homosexuality.  The last lines of the enlistment oath that every soldier entering the military must say is "So help me God".  Many of the military's traditions and morale's are based off of Christian beliefs, and accepting homosexuality would go against those traditions and morale's.  Another problem that can arise is that many people in the U.S. military are uncomfortable with homosexuality, and you can see how this could be a problem when a lot of the times you are eating, sleeping, and working with soldiers in your unit 24 hours a day seven days a week for sometimes a year at a time.  The Don't Ask Don't Tell policy kept a lot of these issues silenced by not allowing them to come up.  If soldier's were not allowed to Ask someone if they were a homosexual, and a homosexual was not allowed to tell anyone then there would be no disputes in a unit over these issues.  Below is a bullet taken from the Don't Ask Don't Tell Policy explaining the traditions and morales of the U.S. military and why they believed at the time that homsexuals should not serve openly(policy concerning homsexuality in the Armed Forces).

 (8)Military life is fundamentally different from civilian life in that—

(A)the extraordinary responsibilities of the armed forces, the unique conditions of military service, and the critical role of unit cohesion, require that the military community, while subject to civilian control, exist as a specialized society; and
(B)the military society is characterized by its own laws, rules, customs, and traditions, including numerous restrictions on personal behavior, that would not be acceptable in civilian society.


this activity must include references
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c111:7:./temp/~c111SNIR00 (Library of Congress - Don't Ask Don't Tell Repeal Act 2011)

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/654.html  (U.S.C.  654- policy concerning homsexuality in the Armed Forces)



each student will then review this beginning on Nov 2.

20 comments:

  1. 1. Strong
    2. Medium
    3. Strong
    4. Strong

    5. You make a lot of good points with why people might be for the Act, but if you found some accounts of people who disapproved of the Act it would strengthen your argument.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1. Described field of interest and described question posed. Strong
    2. Both sides of argument were presented. Medium
    3. Appropriate references were included. Strong
    4. Defended position is described clearly. Stong

    5. Try to be a little more specific in your arguments, especially those against the act. Also, not all christian religions are against homosexuality, try not to generalize.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1. Strong
    2. Medium
    3. Strong
    4. Strong

    5. Your post contained strong points as to why people support "Don't Ask Don't Tell", but lacked clear arguments against it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 1. M
    2. S
    3. S
    4. S

    5. State your field of interest explicitly - I was a bit confused when I started reading. After a while it is quite clear you are interested in a military career, but it would have helped to mention that right at the beginning.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 1. S
    2. M
    3. S
    4. S

    5.Great argument, however, the argument in support of don't ask don't tell is a little short compared to your other arguments.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 1.M
    2.S
    3.S
    4.S
    5. One suggestion I have is to don't forget to state what your field of interest is. I was trying to link this ethical question to a scientific topic, but then realized who you were and that you were/are in the military.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 1. M
    2. S
    3. S
    4. S
    5. I would suggest stating what your field of interest is. I recall you stating in class that you were in the Military but are you going into a science field within the Military?

    ReplyDelete
  8. 1.M
    2.S
    3.S
    4.S
    5. As above comments state, I would suggest stating your field of interest right away.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 1. S
    2. M
    3. S
    4. S

    5. I think your view on the topic and your stance on the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy is very clear but I was looking for some more information on what makes other individuals either against the policy or for it. Good Work

    ReplyDelete
  10. 1.S
    2.M
    3.S
    4.M

    5. There needs to be more argument for and against the policy. I thought it was more how you felt about it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1.S
    2.M
    3.S
    4.S

    5. Good job. One thing to focus on for the argument is presenting more on the side that supports the policy. Also add some specific examples (if there are some) for either side of the issue.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 1.S
    2.M
    3.S
    4.S

    5. I like it, but I think if you gave a few more examples of why people are for or against this it would help enhance the importance of this topic.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 1. Described field of interest and described question posed: M
    2. Both sides of argument were presented: S
    3. Appropriate references were included: S
    4. Defended position is described clearly: S

    5. One Useful comment: I understand that this relates to your life, but not your area of interest/study. You have great points on both sides, could use a little more on why you stand where you do

    ReplyDelete
  14. 1. S
    2. M
    3. S
    4. S
    5. I found it difficult to clearly find the arguments for both sides.

    ReplyDelete
  15. 1.s
    2.s
    3.s
    4.s

    both sides of the argument were clearly explained but in a fashion that was hard to identify each position clearly.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 1. S
    2. W
    3. M
    4. S

    I didn't see an argument against the repeal, or at least not a clear one.

    On a nitpicking issue, you used several words that were spelled correctly but, they are the wrong words. Like "morale" instead of "moral" and "in affect" instead of "in effect". It makes it harder to read what your writing if the reader has to reread the sentence because the idea being described does not make sense.

    ReplyDelete
  17. 1. M
    2. M
    3. S
    4. S
    Clear and defined arguments are needed not just personal feelings

    ReplyDelete
  18. 1. S
    2. S
    3. S
    4. S

    I thought you did very well on your topic. In particular I thought it was interesting that you could comment on having served in the armed forces during the policy and after the repeal.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 1.S
    2.M
    3.S
    4.M

    5. Could have added more information for and against the policy. It seemed a little more opinionated. Well done though.

    ReplyDelete
  20. 1. S
    2. M
    3. S
    4. S

    Nice job. I did however feel as if this blog was a little more opinion based than fact based.

    ReplyDelete